top of page
mock review_edited.png
mock fav_edited.png
mock review_edited.png
mockup 2.png
mockup 3_edited.png

EIFE

Learning French in Lyon

Overview

Role

UX/UI Designer

Timeline

4 Weeks

Tools

Figma, Miro, AI-assisted tools

Concept

Independent portifolio project

Backgrond

Website redesign for a local French language school in Lyon, focused on improving the digital experience, enhancing usability, modernizing the visual identity, and creating a more intuitive experience for international students looking to learn French in France.

The Problem

Users may struggle to navigate the website due to cluttered layouts, inconsistent visual hierarchy, and unclear access to key information.

Project Goal

Imrpove navigation and help prospective students access course information and enrollment details more efficiently.

HOW DO PEOPLE CHOOSE WHERE TO STUDY?

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Through surveys and user interviews, I set out to understand users' main objectives when searching for a language school abroad and what decisions they make to choose one.
 

COMPETITE ANALYSES
 

I researched similiar schools to find features and identify friction points
 

SURVEY

15 people who had been through the process of searching for a language school abroad, to learn their motivation, criterion and struggles.
 

Competitive Analysis

Competitor

Alliance Française Lyon

Booking Process

Easy to book

Visual Language

Head takes a lot of the page, lots of options on courses

Pricing Transparency

Every course has the price

Mobile Experience

AAA

Inflexyon

Doesn't add to basket. Do all the booking at once

Clutched information

Transparent but hard to understand

AAA

Alpadia Lyon

Hard, can't book. Need to send a quote

Hard to

navegate

No. Need to call a consultant 

AAAA

Lyon Bleu International

Hard to find where, but simple process

Lots of videos and pictures. A bit overwhelming 

Need to download a brochure

AAA

RESEARCH FINDINGS

I discorved that...

USER

EXPECTATIONS

Key finds & Insights

  • The Fragmented Search Fatigue: Users reported visiting an average of 3 to 4 different sources (blogs, marketplaces, and social media) before feeling confident about an expensive purchase. This fragmentation leads to "decision paralysis" and a significant waste of time.

  • The Credibility Gap: A recurring sentiment among participants is the "Skepticism Filter." There is a deep-seated distrust of 5-star ratings on retail sites, with users actively seeking out middle-of-the-road reviews (3 or 4 stars) to find what they perceive as the "authentic truth."

“I want to make quick decisions, with no wasted time.”

persona emma_edited.jpg

Goals 

  • Make quick, informed decisions when buying products online.

  • Avoid wasting money on low-quality products.

  • Quickly see trustworthy reviews by browsing multiple sites.

Frustrations

  • Online reviews are scattered across marketplaces.

  • Difficult to filter reviews for relevance or trustworthiness.

  • Doesn’t have time to watch long YouTube reviews.

Behavior/Habits

  • Shops online daily for home goods, tech, her cats, and lifestyle products.

  • Frequently checks product reviews before buying.

29
New York, USA
2 Cats
Marketing Manager
High - uses multiple apps daily

Age:

Location:

Family:

Occupation:

Tech Comfort:

Meet Emma: The busyshopper

“I want to make safe choices for my family, every time.”

persona sophie.jpg

Goals 

  • Ensure the products she buys for her family are safe and healthy.

  • Make better purchasing decisions for food, cosmetics, and household products.

  • Trust ratings that are verified by the community.

Frustrations

  • Hard to find trustworthy health-related reviews.

  • Only find apps that cover limited products.

  • Reviews online are often inconsistent.

Behavior/Habits

  • Uses apps to scan beauty products.

  • Reads both nutrition labels and online reviews.

  • Shares experiences and recommendations with friends and family.

40
Paris, FRA
Married, 3 Kids
Family Doctor
Medium - uses apps mostly for convenience

Age:

Location:

Family:

Occupation:

Tech Comfort:

Meet Sophie: The Health-Conscious Parent

“I want a safe, sustainable, and stress-free shopping.”

persona lucas_edited.jpg

Goals 

  • Ensure products are safe, vegan, and align with eco-friendly values.

  • Avoid health and environmental risks by checking product safety and sustainability.

  • Make informed purchasing

Goals 

  • Ensure products are safe, vegan, and align with eco-friendly values.

  • Avoid health and environmental risks by checking product safety and sustainability.

  • Make informed purchasing.

Behavior/Habits

  • Checks ingredient lists, eco-labels, and allergen information

  • Prefers simple, reliable guidance to make confident decisions aligned with values

  • Searches YouTube and the vegan community for a range of products

55
Rio de Janeiro, BRA
Married
Retired Archtect
Low - Uses Youtube, Amazon and Google occasionally 

Age:

Location:

Family:

Occupation:

Tech Comfort:

Meet Lucas: The Cautions Consumer

Pain Points

Lack of a single, trustworthy platform for general product ratings.

Reviews are scattered across multiple websites, making a quick comparison difficult.

Difficulty in trusting opinions due to fake or incentivized reviews.

Lack of a simple, engaging interface that motivates users to contribute ratings.

Define - User needs and problems

Delivrables

  • Problem Statements

  • How may we

Problem Statement

Today, consumers struggle to find reliable and aggregated ratings for everyday products, from electronics to food and personal care items. There is currently no universal platform where anyone can quickly and easily rate and find products in a transparent way, providing diverse and trustworthy opinions.

How may we...

Help users quickly see all relevant product ratings in one single place?

Make it fast and easy for users of all tech levels to search and rate products?

Allow safety, allergen, vegan, and eco-friendly info clearly ?

Allow users to rate any type of product, not just food or cosmetics?

Fragmented Reviews

Speed & Simplicity

Health, allergies & eco-friendy

Universal product coverage

Ideate - 

Delivrables

  • User Flow

  • Low-fidelity Wireframes

User Flow

RateUP_FLOW.jpg

Low-Fidelity Prototype

The inicial concept

Prototype - Designing the product

Delivrables

  • Style Guide

  • High Fidelity Prototype

Style Guide

#CD1C18

Aa

Inter

#FBBF24

Normal

Médio

Seminegrito

Negrito

Extranegrito

#F4A3A3

#FBFAF9

#000000

Vector.png

RateUp

High-Fidelity Prototype

Test - Validaing

Delivrables

  • Usability Test Objective

  • Usability Test Findings

  • Reflexions & Next Steps

Usability Test Objective

I recruited 5 participants for the Usability Test whom were never in contact with the project to provide diverse and trustworthy.

 

  1. Test if the participants can search for products.

  2. Test if the participants can rate a product.

  3. Test if the participants can share a product.

  4. Test if the participants can add a Allergy to their profile.

  5. Test if the participants can determine whether a prduct is safe based on preferences.

  6. Test if the participants can find their favorites products.

Usability Test Findings

I conducted 5 usability tests that were around 10 minutes each. Participants were able to complete the task with relative ease.  A few places they ran into problems were the following:

Reflexions and Next Steps

This was my first UX/UI project and I learned a lot with it, and showed me a lot room to improvement  improve as well. 

bottom of page